tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1369998004636482033.post1937536124095481457..comments2023-09-01T01:25:17.121-07:00Comments on The Conservative Phrontistery : Ron Paul Was Intimately Involved With His Racist NewsletterJhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11927889966152627253noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1369998004636482033.post-39850193198132659532012-01-29T08:20:17.124-08:002012-01-29T08:20:17.124-08:00If Ron Paul isn't a racist, why publish the tr...If Ron Paul isn't a racist, why publish the trash in his newsletter in the first place? <br /><br />Its clear that he was intimately and involved with the magazine in which he approved each article before publication. The fact that he approved it and never once objected to it before or after these articles were published is troubling. <br /><br />If a magazine or newsletter was found to have published racist material, they would have issued an apology and retraction immediately. Ron Paul never did this. <br /><br />First we got a flat out denial from Ron Paul. Then we get a half admission that he did write articles but we're to believe he only focused on economic issues. But given all the lies Ron Paul has said about his own newsletters, its difficult to believe that he only wrote the economic articles. <br /><br />Even we are to believe that he's being honest that he only wrote the economic articles, he allows well known racists to write the articles. Why hire these men in the first place? Why didn't he reject the articles when these men submitted it for publication? Why didn't he issue a retraction and apology after they were published? Why didn't he fire these men after the article were published? <br /><br />Instead, he let racist men write racist articles with his approval and said nothing about them for many years. <br /><br />Only when he's running for President in 2008 and 2012 does he try to distance himself from his own newsletters that were published under his name. How convenient. <br /><br />There's the additional question of why even try to use racism as a way to increase his business? Its such a horrible business and Public Relations idea unless you know your articles are being read by the minority of racists in America who have no qualms with the content of the newsletters. <br /><br />The evidence is overwhelming. Ron Paul is a racist. There's strong evidence that proves this. Even if we are to view all the evidence in a way that is most favorable to Ron Paul, his actions and words strongly suggest he's a racist.Jhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11927889966152627253noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1369998004636482033.post-6377042095497908342012-01-28T19:06:38.177-08:002012-01-28T19:06:38.177-08:00If you believe those racist statements sound like ...If you believe those racist statements sound like Dr. Paul, you really haven't listened to him. At the very least consider the following evidence:<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0hpiwfM2qo<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HP-mYq4DaJIAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1369998004636482033.post-56441100150058022102012-01-27T22:01:41.631-08:002012-01-27T22:01:41.631-08:00Thanks........interesting information. I hate to...Thanks........interesting information. I hate to think Paul's a liar, too, but that doesn't look that good for him.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com